Appendix: with the Assortment of the blend out-of Intercourse–Amount Combinations

Fuchs, Z., Polinsky, Meters., and you can Scontras, Grams. (2015). The fresh differential signal out-of matter and you may sex for the Spanish. Linguist. Rev. thirty-two, 703–737.

Hartsuiker, Roentgen., Schriefers, H., Bock, K., and you will Kikstra, Grams. M. (2003). Morphophonological has an effect on into the framework from topic-verb arrangement. Mem. Cogn. 31, 1316–1326.

Heycock, C., and you can Zamparelli, R. (2005). Family unit members and you will colleagues: plurality, coordination, while the build out-of DP. Nat. Lang. thirteen, 201–270.

Hinojosa, J., Martin-Loeches, Meters., Casado, P., Munoz, F., and Rubia, F. (2003). Similarities and you can differences when considering phrase-structure and you can morphosyntactic violations inside the Language: a meeting-related potentials research. Lang. Cogn. Techniques. 18, 113–142.

Igoa, J. Yards., Garcia-Albea, J. Age., and you will Sanches-Casas, R. (1999). Gender-number dissociation inside phrase creation into the Language. Ital. J. Linguist. 11, 163–196.

Krstev, C., and you will Vitas, D. (2005). “Corpus. and you may Lexicon – Common Incompletness,” within the Legal proceeding of your own Corpus Linguistics Appointment, eds P. Danielsson and Meters. Wagenmakers, Liverpool.

Malko, A., and you will Slioussar, Letter. (2013). “Appeal problems for the sex arrangement: Research out of Russian,” inside Process Specialized Solutions to Slavic Linguistics: The 3rd Indiana Appointment, eds S. Franks, ainsi que al. (Ann Arbor: Michigan College or university Force), 162–175.

). “Last conjunct agreement in the Slovenian,” in the Procedures of Certified Ways to Slavic linguistics 2006, eds Rpton, M. Goledzinowska, and you may You. Savchenko (Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Courses), 210-227.

Mitic, We., and you will Arsenijevic, B. (2019). Structural ambiguity and you can optionality from agreement activities inside Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian conjunct contract. A good J. Gen. Linguist. 4:6.

Nevins, An excellent., Dillon, B., Malhotra, S., and you may Phillips, C. (2007). The new part away from element-count and have-type in running Hindi verb agreement abuses. Brain Res. 1164, 81–94.

Puskar, Z., and you will Murphy, An excellent. (2015). “Closest conjunct contract in the serbo-croatian: a rule-buying account,” when you look at the Subjects at InfL. Linguistische Arbeitsberichte (LAB), Vol. 92, eds A beneficial. Assmann, S. Financial, D. Georgi, T. Klein, P. Weisser, and you will Elizabeth. Zimmermann (Leipzig: Universitat Leipzig), 441–482.

Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., and you can Garrett, M. F. (1996). Subject-verb arrangement within the Foreign-language and you will English: variations in the character out-of abstract restrictions. Cognition 61, 261–298.

Semant

Willer-Gold, J., Arsenijevic, B., Batinic, M., Becker, Meters., Cordalija, N., Kresic, M., ainsi que al. (2018). When linearity exists more than hierarchy within the sentence structure. PNAS 115, 495–five hundred. doi: /pnas.1712729115

The fresh five logically you’ll be able to combos in addition to their functions try depicted into the (21)

Willer-Silver, J., Arsenijevic, B., Batinic, M., Cordalija, Letter., Kresic, Meters., Leko, N., et al. (2016). Morphosyntactic creation of coordination arrangement into the Southern Slavic–a relative research. J. Slavic Linguist. 24, 187–224.

So it area clarifies certain tech issues about the choices produced in the appearance of the check out, within the light of special qualities out-of South carolina morphology. It’s lined up primarily for those wanting the theoretic and detailed linguistic, in place of psycholinguistic aspects of the research.

Inside our experimental construction, we have capitalized toward fact that inside the South carolina NSg nouns end in both -e or perhaps in -o, and therefore its plural ends in -a great, while at the same time FSg nouns end up in -a, as well as their plural forms end in -e. It returns an excellent entered, but really incomplete syncretism.

The blend out of NSg and you will FPl allows the synthesis of restricted sets ranging from a great syncretic and you can a low-syncretic collection of nouns, as blend of NPl and you may FSg allows for only one possibility, which is syncretic.

We utilized limited sets as with (20a) within critical stimulus. The new selected solution, not, enables several sandwich-possibilities, depending on hence sex–matter integration will come due to the fact very first, and hence just like the history conjunct. This is dependant on other equivalent attention.

The verb contains new endings: -o getting NSg, -a concerning NPl and you can FSg, otherwise -elizabeth having FPl – we.elizabeth., you are able to differentiate NSg out of FPl towards the verb. Consequently, besides the unambiguously standard male conclude -i, when an excellent verb into the -age are delivered, we had been sure that it was FPl, incase a good verb inside the -o is lead single women dating service Houston, we understood it absolutely was NSg. However, whenever a verb in the -a was actually produced – it was unsure if this was plural, agreeing from inside the gender on the first conjunct (NPl), otherwise it actually was just one and you may assented when you look at the sex with the history conjunct (FSg).